Which came first ... a singularity OR an infinite entropy? And just to toss a little gasoline on the physics of quantum irregularity, I haven't a freaking clue as to what any of this might mean. In layman's terms for understand a deep subject.
A debate is raging in the heady world of physics versus quantum mechanics. On the Big Think webpage there runs an article titled "Black Hole Raises A Huge Cosmic Question." Well of course it does. I mean ... why would it not? Anyway with the James Webb Space Telescope blowing the doors off of the physics we all thought we almost understood, well that is the case no more. The rather lengthy article on the Big Think webpage pulls the rug out from under modern physics and now a 'new physics' needs to be created. The Big Think guys include one spiffy image of a black hole in all of it's resplendent beauty and of course I have it posted right about now -
Pretty dang cool I do believe. Problem is that the image of this really distant black hole is clear back to the almost beginning of our cosmos. IF in fact there is or was a beginning. The Big Bang theory is fading faster than a supernova going ballistic and the physics kids and assorted brainiac types are stumped at what the James Webb Space Telescope is forcing the pseudo-intellectual gang to "debate." Dang if'n I don't simply enjoy watching the whiz-kids arguing over how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. I follow the Big Think webpage on account of they post up some really spiffy images of our cosmos and that makes me reminisce about Dr. Carl Sagan. My love of astronomy and all things physics and quantum physics is owed to Dr. Sagan. May he rest in intellectual paradise along with Dr, Stephen Hawking. Thursday machine art is next.
sister -
dood -
phantom -
choke on it -
No comments:
Post a Comment